•7:57 PM
Four years ago in exit polls when voters were asked, "What was the number one issue on your mind that influenced your vote?" This answer was given more than others: "Values."
So, here we are - the party of supposed family values - with a candidate who doesn't really represent those values.
How is it that a candidate who neglected his injured wife and children and cheated on them with the woman he is now married to can look at the republican party and say that he will represent them? How is it that a candidate with a history of gambling, anger, and financial impropriety can say he represents change? How is it that a candidate that has been a member of the congress with the lowest approval rating in history can say he is going to change the way Washington works when the way he works is the same as Washington's way? How is it that he is going to represent the Republican Party?
He can't - and you know what, he said he won't. He said it himself when he accepted the party nomination: "I don't work for a party." As much as I dislike the two-party system you have to wonder if his approach is anything near fixing it.
So, the republicans not only have a candidate that doesn't represent the only thing that won them the election four years ago, they have a candidate that won't represent them if he were elected.
I don't think we should jump on the Rush Limbaugh band wagon and say, "Well, he isn't who I would have voted for but we have to get behind him now and help him win." Just because he is the party's pick doesn't mean you have to support him. There are other choices. Supporting someone you don't want as president just to keep the other person out of office is just as bad. That is band aiding the problem - hiding it - rather than healing it. It keeps a broken system perpetually broken. Voting for someone you don't want won't fix it - it will keep it broken. Let your voice be heard - however you feel. If you love McCain campaign for him. If you love Obama - campaign for him. If you don't - let yor voice be heard and find someone you do love. Republicans and Democrats say if you vote for a third party you are throwing away your vote. I say if you vote for someone you don't want in office you have thrown away your vote.
Rightfully did he pick Governor Palin as his VP candidate - she seems to be many things he is not. She has become a true political star. I worry though that her stardom is a problem for Americans. The light shouldn't be on her - it should be on him. Republicans should remember that they are Americans before they are Republicans and that this man, although the republican choice for president, may not be the best one for America. We have the duty to find out and to vote our conscience.

Over four years ago I said to my wife, "You watch, Barack Obama will be the next Democratic nominee for President." It seemed obvious to me due to the high amount of press coverage he was getting at the time. As the years went on that guess became more and more right. What finally sealed the deal for me was a cover story of a prominent magazine (Newsweek if memory serves) a while ago with a photo of Barack Obama and the words "Barack Obama - the Next President."
It seemed fishy to me then and it still does now.
In the presidential debates it is the media who can pick who can participate and which candidates can't. This gives more face time to the candidates the media prefers and little to no face time for the other candidates.
I recall when Romney won the caucus in Wyoming - the first one of the year - even before New Hampshire! - and how the media didn't even cover it! You couldn't find news of his win anywhere - but when John McCain won New Hampshire he was slated as sure to win because New Hampshire was the first primary - but McCain didn't get the first win - Romney did.
In short, the media picks the contenders and then advertises for the ones they want.
Finally, today when I saw this article I was aghast. The media's new role is to disprove arguments - but not for both parties.
They want Obama as president and there isn't anything you or I can do to change that. They will give him the coverage that he needs and will not give like treatment to McCain. You may think from this article that you know who I am voting for but you don't - not even I do. I just think it is wrong for the media to play an unequal role in politics. The government was not made for them - it was made for us. The media are here for us as well - not the other way around.
Here is the article:
By JIM KUHNHENN, Associated Press Writer Wed Sep 3, 11:48 PM ET
ST. PAUL, Minn. - Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and her Republican supporters held back little Wednesday as they issued dismissive attacks on Barack Obama and flattering praise on her credentials to be vice president. In some cases, the reproach and the praise stretched the truth.
Some examples:
PALIN: "I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending ... and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress. I told the Congress 'thanks but no thanks' for that Bridge to Nowhere."
THE FACTS: As mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a lobbyist and traveled to Washington annually to support earmarks for the town totaling $27 million. In her two years as governor, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation. While Palin notes she rejected plans to build a $398 million bridge from Ketchikan to an island with 50 residents and an airport, that opposition came only after the plan was ridiculed nationally as a "bridge to nowhere."
PALIN: "There is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him speak, it's easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform — not even in the state senate."
THE FACTS: Compared to McCain and his two decades in the Senate, Obama does have a more meager record. But he has worked with Republicans to pass legislation that expanded efforts to intercept illegal shipments of weapons of mass destruction and to help destroy conventional weapons stockpiles. The legislation became law last year. To demean that accomplishment would be to also demean the work of Republican Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, a respected foreign policy voice in the Senate. In Illinois, he was the leader on two big, contentious measures in Illinois: studying racial profiling by police and requiring recordings of interrogations in potential death penalty cases. He also successfully co-sponsored major ethics reform legislation.
PALIN: "The Democratic nominee for president supports plans to raise income taxes, raise payroll taxes, raise investment income taxes, raise the death tax, raise business taxes, and increase the tax burden on the American people by hundreds of billions of dollars."
THE FACTS: The Tax Policy Center, a think tank run jointly by the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, concluded that Obama's plan would increase after-tax income for middle-income taxpayers by about 5 percent by 2012, or nearly $2,200 annually. McCain's plan, which cuts taxes across all income levels, would raise after tax-income for middle-income taxpayers by 3 percent, the center concluded.
Obama would provide $80 billion in tax breaks, mainly for poor workers and the elderly, including tripling the Earned Income Tax Credit for minimum-wage workers and higher credits for larger families.
He also would raise income taxes, capital gains and dividend taxes on the wealthiest. He would raise payroll taxes on taxpayers with incomes above $250,000, and he would raise corporate taxes. Small businesses that make more than $250,000 a year would see taxes rise.
MCCAIN: "She's been governor of our largest state, in charge of 20 percent of America's energy supply ... She's responsible for 20 percent of the nation's energy supply. I'm entertained by the comparison and I hope we can keep making that comparison that running a political campaign is somehow comparable to being the executive of the largest state in America," he said in an interview with ABC News' Charles Gibson.
THE FACTS: McCain's phrasing exaggerates both claims. Palin is governor of a state that ranks second nationally in crude oil production, but she's no more "responsible" for that resource than President Bush was when he was governor of Texas, another oil-producing state. In fact, her primary power is the ability to tax oil, which she did in concert with the Alaska Legislature. And where Alaska is the largest state in America, McCain could as easily have called it the 47th largest state — by population.
MCCAIN: "She's the commander of the Alaska National Guard. ... She has been in charge, and she has had national security as one of her primary responsibilities," he said on ABC.
THE FACTS: While governors are in charge of their state guard units, that authority ends whenever those units are called to actual military service. When guard units are deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, for example, they assume those duties under "federal status," which means they report to the Defense Department, not their governors. Alaska's national guard units have a total of about 4,200 personnel, among the smallest of state guard organizations.
FORMER ARKANSAS GOV. MIKE HUCKABEE: Palin "got more votes running for mayor of Wasilla, Alaska than Joe Biden got running for president of the United States."
THE FACTS: A whopper. Palin got 616 votes in the 1996 mayor's election, and got 909 in her 1999 re-election race, for a total of 1,525. Biden dropped out of the race after the Iowa caucuses, but he still got 76,165 votes in 23 states and the District of Columbia where he was on the ballot during the 2008 presidential primaries.
FORMER MASSACHUSETTS GOV. MITT ROMNEY: "We need change, all right — change from a liberal Washington to a conservative Washington! We have a prescription for every American who wants change in Washington — throw out the big-government liberals, and elect John McCain and Sarah Palin."
THE FACTS: A Back-to-the-Future moment. George W. Bush, a conservative Republican, has been president for nearly eight years. And until last year, Republicans controlled Congress. Only since January 2007 have Democrats have been in charge of the House and Senate.
___
Associated Press Writer Jim Drinkard in Washington contributed to this report.
___
Associated Press Writer Jim Drinkard in Washington contributed to this report.
Found at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080904/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_fact_check on September 4, 2008.
Tell me, when have you seen anything like this on Barack Obama? You probably can't and you probably won't.
